A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 12
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- C
- T2
- that very thine Mors it to be our in-
- dispentable Duty, and of Divine Autho.
- rier, ithout any Revelation, since ele
- Divine Wortemanctuip. Fluman Nature
- cond not subsist withour it; IF they
- coud prove it unpolitick or diltsuctivo
- to Socictr, it voud be much moie For
- their purpole; for Tuch a Relision musE
- necessarilr be talse; nothins con De à
- am t0 Nature, Which ol dixect Conse-
- quence non d destroy Nature.
- But if anr one thinks it beiter olta
- blith d on the Nature ot Cod, I have
- Bheun hou re come to the lnomlodse
- OF it in HIr. LockS Wrar, by alcribirs
- to hum irtraterer by its Contormity to
- Our Nature re perceire to De GoOd;
- because re sec that re cannot admit
- auy imperfection in the Supream. BC.
- inE, Without a Contradiction (Which
- I nali Inem in UIT. Locks Way, wrtien
- i core to the next Hlead) and havine
- by the Lffect Found out the C’ause, e
- nay then conclude the Nature ot G0d
- to be the Arch. Irpe ot ours, because
- re carinot suppole the most Pertect
- Beins can will aur thins contrarr to his
- ovn Nature; For il he coud, the Rule
- Ot that Will must De Comethins lels Per-
- Fect than himselE, (For erhaterer is molt
- Perfect is God) and therctore to will
- ans thins contrary to his omn. Na
- ture; roud be an imperfection in tum,
- erhich to admit in the most perteet
- Beins, is a Contradiction. Fhus (When
Cite
A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 12. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0024?run=74