Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 26

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.89.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. est
  2. nochine in his Principles, Wrhich at allweattens
  3. themain Proots oF a luture state, (o that if
  4. they are thorehe ro amoune to Demonstration,
  5. ther hare no lels Porce and Pvidence upon his
  6. Principles, wrhich rill leave no pretence on this
  7. acconne asainst enem; as ilt plainly appear in
  8. examinins the RemaikcersObjections.
  9. Ton suppose (LaySne) that the Soul maybe some-
  10. times absolulely vithont Thonches, of one lind or
  11. otber: and also, that C0d may, if he pleases (for
  12. any thine me enor bythe Lichi of Nature) sive or
  13. have sivn, to some Systems ofMlatter aP over tocon
  14. ceive and thint. ponchese emo Suppositions. Icould
  15. not male ont any cerranineroof of the Immortalitu
  16. of the soul, and am apt to thine it cannot bedone.
  17. A5EO thc ArIt oF chele Objections, Icontels
  18. I do noc sec oF irhrac Consequence ie IS aE
  19. all to the Proots ot che imiiorealier ot the
  20. Soul; do thes devend uvon che contrary
  21. Supolition, chat che soul alvays thintes : IF chey
  22. do, proots upon à Suxpolition have a very un-
  23. Ture Foundation; buc ler ic be granted, that il
  24. is ever (0 clcarly provd chac chinteins is necel
  25. Caer to the souls Fxistonce, that can no more
  26. prove chat it Call alivasstxilt, chan it proves
  27. thacic has alvass Fxisted; ic beins as Dostible
  28. For chat Omnivorence which trom nochine
  29. are the soul a Beins, to deprire it oF chat Be.
  30. ins in themidst oEis mostrisorousReAections,
  31. a5 in an utcer sulpention oF al Thouehe. IF then
  32. ehis Propolition, That the sont alvays thines,
  33. doesnecprore chacie is Immortal, che contrary
  34. Supolition ealces not arras ans proot oF ic, for
  35. it is no lels caly ro conceire chac a Beine irhich
  36. has cheP over ot Thinkins rich lome interrals
  37. oF Cellarion trom Thouehe, chachas Lixisted
  38. here Forlome cime in a Capaciey ot Ilapviness
  39. Or Milerr, moy be continued in, or restoredro
  40. thelame stace, in a Fucure Lite, chan chat a
  41. Beins wrhich alivass hins, may be continuel
  42. n

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 26. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0038?run=74