Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 27

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.78.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. e
  2. eta
  3. ua
  4. AE.
  5. inthe lame state, but to do tho Remarker aII
  6. che Justice, and sire him aI the saristaction d
  7. can, LBall exanine the Subltance ot Whae he
  8. has Objected againte Mr. Loces AMercion, Wich.
  9. Out entring Farcher inro ihe Dispuce chan may
  10. Terve ro shen Whecher ic is of ary Conlequence
  11. For, Or asainst che lmmorralier ot che Sors.
  12. Mr. Lock CaYS, Men do not thinte in soundStee
  13. andhiskealon is, becaule chey are norC onscionsot
  14. Ic, and eis a Coreradlietion eo lay a Man CBIUHS,
  15. bue is noc Conscions ot ic; rhintins consilcine in
  16. char very chins et our beinsconscious ot il. sp.
  17. On which Suppolition, che Remartiei cannot mate
  18. ont any certain Proofof the Immortality of the Soul.
  19. I(uppole Mr. Lock did noc delisn it a Proot
  20. otche Immorraliey ot chesoul, bur lec us see
  21. Whecher ic weakrens any Proot oF ic, wtich
  22. the Remarker Phouid have Mewn, buc instead
  23. et chat provoles Disticulties, Which that Surpo-
  24. Ccion involres him in, and begins with chisNo
  25. table onc, l monder hon vou can observe tbat jour
  26. Soul sometimes does not thine, for when yon do ob-
  27. serve it, son thinte If a Man conla chine, and not
  28. thint. at the same time, he miehe be able 10 mato
  29. this Observation. This revers d, may bc an Ar-
  30. ument oF lome Force indecd. bur to conclude
  31. chac my Soul doconor aluarsthint, tis luffici-
  32. ene tobnow that chere has lome rime palt in
  33. which I Was not Conscious chat Ithovoht; un-
  34. dess we will allor chac thesont may chinkc, nhen
  35. the Mon does not, irhich is plainly eo matce
  36. Ehem to Persons, a5 MIr. Lock has Pewn F P
  37. 44, and 45. in which che Remarker Cays he umanrno
  38. does nor understand irhat that discourse abont the
  39. denity, ornon Ldenity of the same Main, Nsepine Ist. R.
  40. and matir
  41. and about Cactor and POiux, aims at, P. Lc.
  42. and tends r0. A Dilcuurse aboue ehe non- Ide.
  43. nitys of the same Man, world. L contels, be ve-
  44. ry hard eo undericand; but I Ind no Tuch in
  45. that vlace, or any ocher oFMT. LockS L HaY;
  46. De does nor eriste aE chaerace, as t0 cal OF the
  47. arC
  48. t
  49. II
  50. AC
  51. AI
  52. CC
  53. 0
  54. OVe
  55. hit
  56. IOI
  57. the
  58. ine
  59. dine
  60. 2
  61. F(5. 0)

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 27. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0039?run=74