Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 29

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.85.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. et
  2. BUII
  3. a
  4. Ia
  5. 10
  6. D
  7. Bd
  8. ne
  9. Ia
  10. aprose him, otherrise he Rehes rrith his own
  11. Norions, and noc his irtiom he scemsto dispure
  12. Wich. And ris impossible t0 read MI. L0ckS
  13. Fllay rich the least Actention, and not knon
  14. that he doesnot ule chose threc Terms in one
  15. and the lame significarion; ihich is the Re-
  16. martrer had consider d, he cond not have (0
  17. uch mistaken NII. Lock, or Found Tuch Dissi-
  18. culcies in his Dilcourse. IFMr. Lock had under-
  19. Atood by the sont, Man and Person che lame
  20. thino, he won d never have mado such a Oue-
  21. Aion, Whecher the sont chintrins apare, Whrae
  22. ihc Man is not at aIl conseoins OF, IVerC nOC a
  23. distinct Per(on, lrom the Man; Wrhich nou d be
  24. just ehe same thing as to ask, Whether the SouI
  25. chinkins apare, wrhat che soul is nor conscious
  26. Ot, be noc a distinet Soul Fiom the Soul: BUE
  27. understandine by Person as he does Self. Con (ei-
  28. onsness, and by Man che Soul and Body united
  29. he may question hecher ehe same Sont, the
  30. same permanent Substance, chirkine apart from
  31. the Body; in Connd Slecp, Wrhac che walcine Man
  32. is not conscious oF, irhecher that incommunica
  33. ble Conscionsness does not make the Sont, and ehc
  34. an consistinq oF Body and Soul, truo distinct
  35. Pertons; Personal Identity, consiktins in the
  36. Came Conscionsness and noc in che tame Substance,
  37. For Whaterer Substance there is, Withont Con-
  38. Scionlness chere isn Person; Conscionsness there-
  39. Fore and not substance, meline a Person, ine
  40. Tme Consciousness ust inalce the Pame Per
  41. Ton, Wrhecher in che lamse, or in differentSuBstan-
  42. ces; and no Farther than chelame conscious-
  43. nels extends, can there be the lame Perlon-
  44. but whereerer there istro distinct incommuni-
  45. cable Conscionsnesses, there is euro distivet Per-
  46. sons, tho in che tame Suostance.
  47. Dut Farther, nOL OnIy NII. LockS OneRion
  48. mas be made. Suxxolins eha soul a distinet per-
  49. manen Sustance, buc he cou d not malie it uvon
  50. a33

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 29. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0041?run=74