A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 28
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- Came Mansnot beine the same Mlan. Ile lay
- indeed, thatif the soul can nhilst the Body is
- Rccpine, have its thineine and enjoyments apari
- ihicb che Man is not at all Conscions of, his Soul
- When hesteeps, and the Man consistins oF Bodi
- and Soul, when he is maline, are tvo Fertons.
- And he Farther illustrates che lame ching in his
- Discouese oF Castor and Polux, Which it it be
- thouohe ablurd to altert, eis not hard to
- find what that Discourse aims ac, v. 8. 1o
- Them that Cuch an ablurditr will follon From
- this suxpolition, That the soul chintes when
- the Man is noc Conscious oF it. BUE
- ertacever that Discourse aiins aC, oF Wvtat
- Conequence can it be coche Immortaliey ot
- chesout, supposins it does not alvays chink:Thae
- ehe Remarteer Cays nochins oF. Buc it Wwils noc
- De iniprover here to takre notice ot an Interence
- he drans trom it in his second Remartess That
- NIr. Lock does nor think che soul a Permanent
- Substance distinct From the BOdy. This (CayShe)
- (cems to be the Supposition non eo upon, rohen jout
- question whether a Man mahine and scepine rich-
- DuE Thonches be the fame Man. IF there bestilt
- thesame Sonl, the Came permanent Substance, I see
- noroom for shat Duestion, or Doubr, which pou
- make. Elere ehe Queltior is again curnd, not
- onty Erom the same Person eo the Tame Man,
- Dut to Rcevine mithont Thoushes, trom Acep.
- ins mith Thouches, that he is not conscions of,
- wrhich are very ditterent Cales as to this Oue
- Ation, tho much che lame indecd, a5 to the
- ehins ir Celt, bue that che Remarkeer non t al
- lor. But perhapshe cakes thesoul, Man and
- Person, ro henitre the Came chins, aud s0 ther
- mas tohim; everrManhastheliberey tomalie
- his onn Wordsstand For what Idca he plealesi
- Duc when he argues ao2inst cheOpinion ot an-
- ocher, he mule conlider in irhat sense chole
- Perms are us d by chat orher, and in chaesente
- oppol
Cite
A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 28. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0040?run=74