Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 37

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Besides (P. 175 BC) Y am neterWV at a loss Yst. R. P. 9
  2. hom 1otrame anv Idea of a Dead SoUL, or 2d. R. P. 16
  3. os a Spirit mithout Zise or Thonchrs. FTOW a
  4. Fead Soul comes in here, ldon FKnON
  5. Can there be no Lite, Where there is no
  6. ThouehE: Icontels that l’have hitherto
  7. thoughe thac Inseets and Planes hare Litc,
  8. tho Idid nor supvose chat chey do alrays
  9. think. HTC gOCS On: What is tise Soul mhen
  10. stre does not thinte: She must be actnally some-
  11. thins is se exist: She must then have some
  12. Proverties, whereby se is distinenisted from
  13. nothino, and frommatier. And asain, In
  14. thesecond RemarK, Tou say the Sout has no P. 24.
  15. Eatension, nor at certain fits any Cocitation:
  16. What ean the sont be then but a certain
  17. Pover actine in the Body, wben the Body is
  18. prepar dfor the exercise of it; and ceasime to
  19. act when the Body is indispos d. Forrhich I
  20. antver, That it is true, re have no Idca
  21. OF the Soul bue by her ODerationS; DUE
  22. that is no moro a tealon to conclude that
  23. se is nothins nhen MC does nOt operate,
  24. than when Medoes, since me are equalsis
  25. ienorant Wrhac the soul is, rheu we do
  26. Fhirk. a5 When irc do not. Iask What is
  27. the Sont wrtien Me does think. IS Me a
  28. real permanent Cubstance: What chen
  29. are her peculiar properties, Whereby Me
  30. is distinouisd From ocher substances : IF
  31. it De Caid the porrer oE chinkins, I asH
  32. Whether Me has ans other Properries to
  33. distinguista her trom Nochins, and from
  34. MaLter IEnOF, Then Nothing, Or Matter;
  35. mashare the Porrer ot thinkins. This is
  36. plaim

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 37. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0049?run=74