Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 67

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. C
  2. oreceded that Position; it Peems more Ra-
  3. tional, and Natural; in the isporance
  4. Men are oF mhar the Soul is, frA to enquire
  5. Whether thac Porver ot Cogitation which
  6. ther perceire in themlelres may noc De
  7. communicated to Matter; anditcher finc
  8. no contradiction in ic, (and upon thac
  9. chink he to determine ot the nature ot a
  10. chins, Which thes cannot certainly knoi)
  11. thence toconclude, that the soul is not a
  12. Substance distinet From Matter. Buthorr-
  13. soerer that be, it cannot De concluded,
  14. thac chole nho make this Ouection g0 up-
  15. On a Suppolition That thesont is not a distinct
  16. permanant substance, wrhichis the Principle
  17. the Remarker mond hare supposd tobe
  18. MT. Locks; The Ouestion, a5 MT. Lock
  19. makes iC, is nOt Whether our Cocitations are
  20. the operations of Cod, or of Matier: DuE
  21. Whether Cod has siren the Porer ot CO.
  22. sitation to a Material, Or an Immarerial
  23. substance, and wrhich ay foerer this Oue-
  24. Aion is resolred, thesoul must equally Dc
  25. Cupposd a distinct permanent substance; toe
  26. a Material Substance iS nOF lels a Substance
  27. than an Immaterial.
  28. But the Fallacy by which thac suppos
  29. tion, That the Sont is noi a distinet permanent
  30. Substance, i5 imputed to MT. Lock, VPOn
  31. his doubrins whether chesoul may not be
  32. Material, lies in this, thac suppolins the
  33. Soul not to De a Substance distinet trom
  34. Marcer, is taken for the Pane chins, a5
  35. supposins it not to be distinet trom the
  36. Body, rrhicti are rers differene supposi-
  37. EIDHS

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 67. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0089?run=74