Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 66

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. C 66
  2. opinions oF the sout; and much more ser-
  3. viceable to Relision, than thole can De
  4. (Whacerer zeal ther pretend for ic) intio
  5. Will nor allon that the Returrection, or a
  6. Future Stace, ean bechtablisd upon any
  7. rpochelis buc their omn; for no doubt,
  8. it Men are convincd ot a Future State,
  9. tis oF no consequence uxon hat grounds
  10. ther areso, their mistakes about the sub-
  11. Aance oF the Soul, wil noc endanger their
  12. MOrals, Or their Salration; And iF MI.
  13. LockS Discourse et Identity aud Diversiy.
  14. as desiend to resolre the disticulties that
  15. may arile about the Relurrection, that can
  16. onlu Mem his concernto secure that Fsen
  17. eial point uxon everr Mans Principles,
  18. since he determinies the Ideas et Identity
  19. aud Direrher upon sereral contrary sup
  20. volitions; aid cherctore there can Be nO
  21. realon to conclude ans onc of them t0 Be
  22. his opinion more than anocher untess he
  23. has declard in tavour ot onc, Which he
  24. has doneero or chree times in that Chap.
  25. Ter For Chis, That the Sont is one Individual,
  26. Immaterial Substance, ehe direet contrary
  27. to that whieh the Remarker nou d have
  28. thousht tobehisovinion.
  29. WVe corr: enom 10 thenext and last dis-
  30. rute which the Remarker mentions a5
  31. C. F. 24. erilies from rhac Principle, That the Soul
  32. is not a Subs: ance distinct from l’od and Mat-
  33. ter. Trom this Posirion (he (a75) a uestion
  34. sprines up concernine thc Povers of Matier-
  35. er Wrherher Natter be not capable of Cocita-
  36. sions l Mould rather chink chis vestion
  37. Pre.
  38. 3.5. 250

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 66. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0088?run=74