Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. -

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Lhe Contents.
  2. XIX. A Confutation ds those Neote- XXXI. That ihe Doctrine os Dre exi
  3. ricks, oho deny Incorporeal Substanee. Rence and Fransmipration of Souls, hac
  4. 1o have been asserted by any of the An-
  5. cients. The Antiquity of that Doctrine
  6. proved from Plato, nho also prosessealy
  7. maintained it.
  8. PaeC 18
  9. XX. Aristorle litervise an Apserter os
  10. Incorporeal Substance.
  11. 1c
  12. XXI. That PpicuruS consuleth Ibis
  13. Opinion as that rohich hac been before
  14. maintained by Placo and other Ancients.
  15. 20
  16. XXII. That alt ihose Dhilosophers, robo
  17. before Placo, hela the Immorcalier oF che
  18. Soul, and a Deiey Dictinet fron the
  19. vorid, vere undonbredly Incorporealists;
  20. es particularius Pychagoras, nho also
  21. maintaned a Frinier of Dirinc ErpO
  22. Aa(C5.
  23. ibid.
  24. ZXIII. Parmenides, a Strenons AS
  25. serter of Incorporeal Substance, 1ocet her
  26. with those reho held, That al thines did
  27. not PIOW, but some thines Stand. 23
  28. XXIV. Empedocles vindicated front
  29. beine either an Acheist, or Corporealict,
  30. et laree.
  31. ibid.
  32. XXV. AMAXAGOTAS, an open and pro-
  33. fessed Asserter of an tncorporeal Minc. 26
  34. XXVI. Inserred front al Ibis, Lhat
  35. IBC Ancient Rcomicts before Democricus,
  36. vere both Theists and Incorporealists:
  37. and this further consirmed.
  38. ibid.
  39. also ihe same Orisinal.
  40. PasC 38
  41. XXXII. This not Consined by those
  42. Ancients 10 Human Souls onely, but FX
  43. tended 10 alt Souls and Lires whatsoever.
  44. XXXIII. AI ihis proved from Pmpe-
  45. docles, who plainty asserted the Pre exi-
  46. Rence, as vellas the Post existence of alt
  47. Souls, from this Fundamental Principle
  48. That Nochins ean come trom Nochins.
  49. nor soc eo Nochins.
  50. XXXIV. A Censure of this Doctrine,
  51. That from this Ciround may be solidly pro-
  52. ved, ihe Puture Immorcalier of Puman
  53. Souls, but not their Pre exictence: be-
  54. cause all Souls must be Created by God,
  55. some time or other.
  56. XXVII. TBat ebere is not onelys no In-
  57. XXXV. An Hy pothesis to Salve the In-
  58. corporeier of the Souls of Brutes, with
  59. ont iheir Post exictence, and Successive
  60. Franciniorations.
  61. XXXVI. And, That this will not Pre-
  62. jndice the immorcalier of Duman SoulS.
  63. XXXVII. But that the Fmpedoclean
  64. Eyporhesis, is indeed of tho Two, more
  65. Rational, than the Opinion of those, nho
  66. matie the Souls of Bruces all Corporeal.
  67. ibid.
  68. XXXVIII. Moreover, that ibe Consti-
  69. intion of the Aromical Phy HOIOBY, is
  70. consisteney, betroixt Acomolor and such in it sels, asthat rmhosoever tintertains
  71. Theoloer, but also a Natural Coenation-
  72. proved from ihe Orixin ofrhe Acomical
  73. Phyholoer, which procceded in seneral
  74. From the Vietory and Triumph of RCaIOn
  75. 27
  76. it iboronehly understandine the same
  77. must necds hola Incorporeal Substance ;
  78. in Live Parriculars.
  79. AC
  80. XXXIX. Tivo great Advantages of
  81. the Acomical or Mechanical Phy(olO8Y;
  82. ZXVIII. A more Particular Acconnt ihe First wbereof is ihis, That it renders
  83. over Sene.
  84. of ihe Orixin of ihis Acomical PhiloCo. ihe Corporeat morid Incelligible, which
  85. Phy, Sron that one Principle OEReaCOn, no other Philosophy doth.
  86. XL. The Second Adrancase of il
  87. Phat in Nature Nochine comes trom
  88. Nochins, nor soes co Nochins. And that it prepares an easy and clear may, for
  89. ibat ihe ancient Acomolo mas bnilt up. ihe Demonstration of Incorporeal Sub-
  90. ibid.
  91. on this F’oundation, proved at laree. 29
  92. XXIX. That this sels Same Principle,
  93. AanCC.
  94. XL. I. Concluded from al these Premil-
  95. which made ihe Ancient Acomicts discard Ses, That ihe Aneient Molchical Philolo
  96. Oualicies and Substantial Forms, made Phiy, vas Integrated and Made uD of
  97. them also assert Ineorporeat SuBTTanCC. 35
  98. these Trvo P’arts, Acomical Phy (OlOSY,
  99. XXX. And with it immorcalicy OE and Theoloey or PneumatoloBY.
  100. Sou15.
  101. 50
  102. XL. II. But that this Fntire Philosophy,
  103. vas

Cite

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0108?run=74