A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. -
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- IHC CCONECHES.
- Union, and so near a Conjunction, betrvixs (Tharrbe Placonists Intention in Subordinarine
- ther Three Eypostales;as no mbere etse 1o be rbeir ThreeHypoctales, onelyro exclude a Plu-
- found in Nature. Plocinus, That there is NO-
- chine becween chem, and That they are Oneli
- Noc che very Came. Thoy actnomledee also.
- ralier of C0. ordinace Independene C0d5. Jhat
- none of PlatoS Threc EypOMaleS; Creatures.
- but that ihe Pssence of ihe Godhead belonget H
- beir Perichorelis or Muruall Tnexistence. The 1orhem All; ibey beine all L ternal, Necessaritys
- Threc Fypostales One Dirinier 1o ibe Placo. Exittene, Intinice, or Omnivocent, and Cre-
- nius, in ihe Came manner, as the CenerC, Ra- aCOurS. Therefore in ibe sense of ibe Nicene
- dious Distance Immorable, and Movable Cir. Conncill, ConsubstanciaII and Co. equaII. Tb0
- cumterence oF a Sphear, al Ore Sphear. Th0 Fessence of the Godhead, wherein all ibe Threc
- Pirst Intinice Goodness, ibe Second Intinice (Eypostales agree, as vell 10 ihe l’aibers, at
- Wiledom, ihe Third Intinice Active LOVC,
- and Porer Substantia II.
- Pa8C590, 591
- From ibis full Acconnt of ihe True and CC
- nuine Platonicle Prinier, ils boch Aereement
- and Disaereement with ibe Christian Plainty
- appeareth. Pirst its Rereement in ihe Threc
- Placonilis, GeneraiI and UnivertalI. PogC
- 596, 597
- Desides which, ibe Genuine Placonilts mould
- actnomledee also, al rheir Three IIyDOlaleS
- to be Homooulian, Co. esenciall or ConsubItan-
- cialI, ver in a furrber Sense; as matine up Onc
- Lundamentall chines before mentioned; and Encire Diviniey: Asibe Root, Stock and BrAn
- consequently ils Discrepance from arianisin. ebes, Co. esencia II 10 a Vinc. 2be Friniey noc
- 501, 592 So Undivided, as is Threevere not J hrec in it.
- Secondly, its Disapreement normithstandine
- Fromthe Non received Doctrine, in ihat it sup-
- The Inequalier and Subordinacion in ihe Pla-
- conick Trinier, within ihe Deier it self ovely.
- Poses ihe ThreC AyPOstales not ro bave One and and in ihe Kelation of ibe Llypoltales 10 one a-
- ihe Cime Singular LNenCC, nor vet an Absolute nober; ibcy beine ad exera all One aud ibe
- Co Equalier. but a Craduall Subordinacion, Came Cod, Foynily Concurrine in ihe same
- and EsenciaII Dependence. Vpon which ac-
- conn, said by some, to Symbolire wich aria-
- nim borvever different from it in ibe Main
- Point.
- 592
- actions, and in ibat respect, devoid es lnequa-
- lIEY.
- 597, 590
- Furrhermore, ibe Platonick Christian voula
- uree, Tbat accordine 1oihe Principles os Chri-
- Desides which ihe best of ibe Platoniis, Rianier it self, ibere must necds besome Deven-
- Sometimes Guilty of RXITAVASANE ExprestionS. dence and Subordinacion in ihese Hypostales
- elocinus bis ouocistis se vai nuorisa, That our in their Relation 10 one anoiber; a Prioriiy and
- Tlumane Soul is of ihe Came Species with the Polteriorier of Order and Dienier: Ibat rohieh
- Munctane Soul, or Third AVPOcta(iS; TBAL is Originally of it Sels, bavine some Lind of Pri-
- beine but ihe FIder Silter. Wthich indeed is oriey and Superiorier, over ibst which i reboliu
- eo matie it Cx- F SencialI or Consubltancia II with Derived from it. Tbe Second and Thirc IIV-
- us Men, as S. Austine understood it. Zbis a poctases, not so Omnipotent as ibe FirH. be-
- Foundation for Creature. Worctip or Idolacrr. cause not able 1o Becet or Produce 1b1t. Hence
- Wbyrhe Arians boConstancinc callod Porphyri-ihe s’irst Apled by Macrobius, ibe MOR Om-
- anilts. Buethis Doctrine, as Repuenant +0 PlacO, nipotent OF all. Sundey passaces in Scripture.
- So elservhere Contradicied by Plocinus himsets. Favourine ibis Typochelis, as also Orchodox
- 593, 594 Fachers. Achanalius his Resemblances totheO.
- Thar normiibstandine, a Platonicle Christian rixinall Lixhe and ibe Secondarr Splendor;
- vould apoloXire for Placo and ihe Genuine Py. 10 ihe Pountain and ibe Sircam, Ibe Root and 1he
- chacoreans, afcer ibis manner. Pirst, 2B et ba- Branch, ibe W ater and ihe Vapour. Ihe Lqualiey
- vine no Scriptures, Conneills, nor Crceds, 10 di- asserred by 1b0 Orchodox, in may os opposition
- rec ibem in ihe Dartnessof ibis Mystery, and 1o 1oihe arian tnequalier, of Cod and Creature;
- suide iheir Laneuase, ibey the more exeusable, Tbat they Equally C0d, or Uncreated. No1-
- is nos alvays unitorm, and sometimes RXera- withstandine mbieh, some tnequalier amonest
- vaPANE. More 10 be mondred at, ibst ibey ibem alloved by Petavius and oibers, as Tbis
- Monld approach so near ihe Chriltian Fruch. God, and Ibat Perton.
- 59+, 595
- 599,600
- Llovever, no necessrys os any more tnequali-
- And for iheir Gradual Subordinacion of ex and Subordinacion in ihe Placonicle, theM
- Tirpoltales, and Dependenee ofthe Second and in ihe Christion Trinies; ibcy beine but Inti-
- Third apon ihe First; Tbat ihese Placonilts nite Coodnels, and Intinice Wiledom, and In-
- bercinthe more excusable, becanse the Majoriry tinice active LOre, and Pover SubstanciaII.
- cs Chriltian Doctors, for the sirst Three Cencuries, Anorher Eypochelis of some Placonists, binted
- See 10 have asserteu ihe same.
- 595, 596 by 5. Auttine out of Porphiyry, mbich mates ihe
- 2b0 Placonicle Chriltians furiher Apoloeie; Third Aypostalis a Mydelle bermixs ihe FirlI
Cite
A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0149?run=74