Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. -

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.87.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. PHe C OnFeNES.
  2. and Second; and implies, noc so mueb a Gra- rous wirh ihe RoVt. Besides wbich, oucreriis, ouo-
  3. dacion, as a Circulation inthe Frinier. Pare cctic, and ouorviis, used by achanalius, and o-
  4. 600 601 ibers, es Synonynous with suitord. None u)
  5. Ac for ihe Placoniis supposine their Phrec which vords senisy an Idemier of Singular X(-
  6. Trpoltates (Thonxh Onc tncire Dirinier) 10 sence, but Generat or Univertal onelv. 260
  7. have their Distinct Singular FsTences, itbont Conneit of Chalcedon, That our Saviour Christ
  8. rohich ebey conceive iheu contd be nothine but es to bis Ilumanier, was Flomoousious or Con-
  9. Threc Names, ibe Placonick Christian monld Substancial with us Men. Zbus does AchanaliuS
  10. male ibis apolOBY; Tbs ihe OrctiodoX F2-
  11. chers themselves vere ceneral ofibis persicasion,
  12. 7b 11 ibe Fstence of ib0 Codhead wherein all
  13. ibe Threc Pertons agree, nor One Singutar, but
  14. onclo One Commonor Univertal L Nence. Their
  15. Distinction torhis purpose, betroixt esta and ice-
  16. eanc ihserhe former nus Common or Generi-
  17. cal, ehe lorrer Singularor IndividuaI. Theo-
  18. dorec, Balil, and mang oibers. Pecavius his
  19. actorledremene, ibst ibe Grects D niversally
  20. eerced herein.
  21. 601, 602
  22. bc Opinion os Crecorr Nysen, Crrit, Da.
  23. malcen, and oiberr. Ibsc ihe Vertons of ihe
  24. deny, theSon or Word, as such, tobe Hlomoou-
  25. lious or Consubstantial ith Creatures; as also
  26. hcassirmeth men to be Consubstancial with onc
  27. anorhersevery Son Consubstancial and Co. eNen-
  28. cialriih bis P’acher.
  29. Pa5 C605, 606
  30. Morcover ih0 Sensecfihe Nicene PacHerS, in
  31. ibeir Consubstancialicy, may more fully appear
  32. Srom ihe Doctrine es arius opposed by ihem;
  33. bich made ihe Sona Creature, and therefore
  34. (a5 achanalius rriteth) ercesinor or ainctecoloor
  35. os adisserent LNenceor Substance fromt iBC P2-
  36. cher. Proved elearty from AchanasiuS, Ihat by
  37. ihe Consubstancialier os ihe Word, vus meant
  38. Trinier no oberrosies One, iben os Phrce Indi- no more iben ils beine not a Creature, or LInere-
  39. viduals under ibc same Species, or as Threc accc.
  40. Men apree in ihc Come common Plumaniey.
  41. These ibe Chics APercersos on Absolure, Inde-
  42. Dendene, ond Un- Subordinace Co. equaliey.
  43. Ibis ibe oncto fonle ihec S. Crril sinds in ibc
  44. Placonis has cherdid nos osseri such a Consub-
  45. Mancialier. It hereas ebis Primier Pricheilm: ihc
  46. Three Pertonsrhercos beine no more One God,
  47. iben Phrec Nen are Onc Nan. Plorvever Ibis cer-
  48. eain ihac these l’acters did not suppose ihe Threc
  49. Lrpollatesos ihe Prinier co hive all ibe same
  50. Singular LNTencC. Anoiher Lxeream ibat sprune
  51. upasterrearde in eheroom os ihc former Priche-
  52. ilm, ind orned by no oiber durboriey, ihen os a
  53. Laceran ConneilI.
  54. 603, 604
  55. And ehas ehes Samene(of Singular LHencc
  56. as noc asserred by ihe Nicene Fachers, and sirst
  57. Opposers of arius. Pirst, cleurly actnomleded
  58. 606,608
  59. 604, 605
  60. L’urrher Proos, ont os Achanalius thar by Con-
  61. substancialier, is nor meant a Samene(Sos Singu-
  62. lar, but onely os General L. NenCC. As also out of
  63. S. Austinc.
  64. 6c8, 611
  65. Lastlv. Thasihe Tlomoonlian PacherS did net
  66. assert acainst arius, a SamenelS of Singular LF-
  67. Tencc, evident from iheir Disclaimine ibose 1rvo
  68. other vords, lavrodoon and Moroinor, Cas bavine
  69. a Sabellian sense inthem,) ihe former by lpi
  70. phanius, ibo larter by actanalius. 50 ihat
  71. ibeyrobo asserred ihe son 10 be Plomooulious,
  72. Consubstancial with ihe Facher. denied him t0
  73. be Monooulious or Paurooulious, that is, 10
  74. haverhe lame Sinpular L. NenCC.
  75. 612, 613
  76. lirom all these Considerations, concluded hy
  77. ihe Placonick Chrictian, Lb st as the Genuine
  78. Prinicy os Placo aereed with ibat of ibeOe-
  79. chodox Chriltians, in beine not Hecerooulian,
  80. Dur ebis surcher lvident scom bence; because bue Tlomooulian, Co. estencial or Consubstanci-
  81. by eccarius.
  82. ihc same Orchodon Pachers, robo opposed Aria-
  83. niem, did also condemm Sabellianitin; whicb
  84. aseried, l’acter, Son and Hloly GhoH, 10 b0
  85. al: not made up os C,Od and Creature, but alt
  86. Hlomoxencalos Uncreated, or Creacour: so did
  87. iho Priniey as iho Li’irst Orchodox anci- arians
  88. buc Onc Tyvollalis, ibat is, 1o bave bur One and herein aeree mish ihe Placonicke Triniey; thac
  89. ihe same Sinoular FHence; and consequent v ac-
  90. Lnoroledeed nociber Priniey ihon os Names or
  91. Vorde.
  92. 605
  93. it as not Monooulian, or Taucooutian, One
  94. and che Pame Singular Esence, under ThreC
  95. Names or Hocions oncly: but really Threc Hy-
  96. 512
  97. I1 appeares b also srom bence, Because ihe W ord postales or PertonS.
  98. Nevertbeless, bere remaineth a Ouection 10
  99. Tlomooulios had never auv other Senle, 1ben 10
  100. sienisy ibe Aprcemene of thines Numerically be antvered; WBether Achanalius, ibe Ni-
  101. disserine, insome Common and Gencrat Nacure cene Lachers, and allibe P irst Anci- Arians did
  102. or LNenCC. S. Balit, Zbat ibc same ibine is iheresore asseri ibe same ibine wilh OreB. Ny
  103. nos Honmonsions Co-estencial or Consubitan- sen, Cyril, and orbers, That 1b0 Threc Pertons
  104. in ih0 Prinier, vere but Three Co. ordinace
  105. Individuals, under ihe same Species, bavine
  106. cial wich it self. bat alrvays One chins vich a-
  107. Plocinus. S0 also in achanalius, heassirmine sbe onely a Speciliele unier or Idencies; (besides
  108. Nocher. 1o ouolor ihe some oith ourerca in
  109. Branches so be Homooutious aud Congene. Contene ol WilI) or ihat ihey all aeree in iho
  110. M.

Cite

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0150?run=74