A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XIII
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- The DR F F AC F.
- The question is, WWhether those they calt
- Nominal Trinicarians, are liable to the
- charee of Sabellianim; the ansiver is, That
- they cannot, because they assert far more
- than three NammeS, 2i2. Thac cach Per-
- Pon hath che divine Nature distincly be-
- lonsins to him. But say they. Thele animado.
- Perlons are bue mere MOdes. NO, sap P. 29r.
- the other; We donor lar that the Perlon
- 15 oniy a Modus, but chat it is the divinc
- Nacure, Or Crochead sublisting under luch
- a Modus, (o chat the Crodhead is RiIl in-
- cludedinir, jornedtoit, and diltinguistr
- ed by it. Crant aIl thus, the 2nitarians
- reply. vet nhere chere is the lame indiri-
- dual Substance, the Perlon can be onlv a
- Modus. T0 Wvhich et is ansiver d, That
- this individual Substance hath threo di- Fricheism
- cinet mars ot subsistins, accordino co
- Wrhrich it sublicts distinetly and difterentiy
- in cach ot the chrec divine Perlons. So
- that here lies the main point, whether il
- be Sabellianilm, to assert the same indivi-
- dual Substance under three such different
- Modes of Subsistence. IF it be, the most
- learned and judicious of the Fathers did
- not tnou what Sabellianim meant (as I
- chareed, P.
- 306.
- have seu d at large in the follovine Dis. Chap. VII.
- course) for ther utterly disouned Sabellia-
- nim, and vet asserted, That the several
- Hypoctales
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XIII. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0019?run=74