A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXII
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- Tbe EB F B A C B.
- Techeilm a Man may quie his Explication without
- . P. SC. Fareins with che Article it sCIF. And so
- he may retain the Article with his Explica-
- FIOn.
- But suppose a Man 10 assent to the fun-
- damentat Arricle it self, and be mistatien in
- his Explication of it, can he be charged
- with Heresse about this article: For He-
- rese must relate to the fundameni al Article
- io which he declares his bearty and unfeien-
- ed cssent; but here ve sappose the mistate
- ro lie onty in the Explication. 45 for in-
- stance, Sabellianim is a condemned and ex-
- ploded FTeresie, for it is contrary tothe ve-
- ry Doctrine of ihe Trinitr; but suppose one
- vho asserts the Voctrine os chrec P’ertons,
- Bould make themto be chree Modes, must
- such a one presently be chareed with Here-
- TC, before ve see uhether his sxplication
- be consistent vith the fundamental Article
- or not. For this is liable to very obvious
- Objections, that the Pather becets a Mode
- instead of a Son, that ve pray 10 three Modes
- instead of three real Persons, that Modes
- are mutable thines in their ooon Nature, etc.
- but must ve from hence conclude such a one
- suilty et Teresce, When he declares, that
- he withai supposed them not to be mere
- Modes. but tbat the divine Essence i5 +o be
- taken tocether with the Mode to mate a Per-
- Sor
- chargea
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXII. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0028?run=74