A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXIV
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- TBe P R F F ACF.
- Nature, (Which he calls pre ingoru l na
- E) Which can acree to none else. And
- the main arcument he vent upon vas this,
- that untess ve assert a sincular Nature in
- the HypoRales, we must say, that the
- Wvhole Trinity vas incarnate; as untess there
- be a singular humane Nature distinet from
- the common, Christ mast assume the Whole
- Nature of Mantind. And this argument
- from the lucarnation, vas that which made
- Rocelin, in the becinnine of the disputine
- ACe, A. D. 1093, 1o assert, Thac the
- chree Perlons ivere chree chines dictinet
- trom cach other, asthree Angels or tliree
- Men, because ochermise che incarnation
- ofthe second Perion could not be under-
- Anicm. Rood, as appears by Anlelmis Fpistles, and
- exist. L. 2. his BoolE of the Incarnation written upon
- D.
- Dende that occasion. But as Antelm seus at
- Prinic. Targe, if this argument hold, it must prove
- the three Persons not only to be diltinet,
- but separate and divided Subllances,
- (Which is directly contrary ro this ReW Fx
- plication) and ihen there is no avoidine
- Tritheim. But to return to Toh. Philo.
- Donus, who, saith Nicephorus, divided
- the indirisible Nature ot Crod into chrec
- Individuals as amonsMen: Which, saith
- he, is repugnant to thesense of the Chri-
- Rian Church; and he produces the Testi
- MOn
- _C. C. 3
- C. 48.
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXIV. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0040?run=74