A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXVI
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- TBe DRF F AC F.
- the consequence of it; for these rejected al
- kind of Tritheilm, Which Philoponus sav
- weil enouxh must follou from his Doctrine,
- but he denied any real Division or Separa-
- tion in those Substances a5 to the Deity.
- Esid. Oris Tsicore saith, Thac che Tricheilts omned
- nelde TH Cliree C0dS, 25 WWell a5 three Persons;
- and thac it God be said 10 be Triple,
- there must follo a Pluralier oF COcS.
- But there vere others called Triformiani,
- A8. de of iwhom S. Augultin speates. Who hela
- arCl. 6. 74.
- the three Perlons to Be three diltinet
- parts, Whichi beins united made one Cod.
- nhrich, saith he, is repusrane to the di
- vine verfection.
- But amone these Severians, there vere
- three severat opinions:
- T. Of Philoponus, vho held one com-
- mon Nature anst three Individual.
- 2. Of those Woho said there vas but one
- Nature and one HIy pOlta(IS.
- 3. Of those who asfermd there vere three
- distinet Natures, but withal, that there
- vas but one indivisible Godhead; and
- these disser d from Philoponus in the main
- eround os Tricheism, vhich vas, that he
- hela the common Nacure in the Triniey,
- 2o be onty a Execitick Nature, and such as
- it is amone Men. For Philoxonus himself
- in the vords which Niceptorus produces,
- dot
- XXXV
- l. 7. dela
- IIC.
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXVI. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0042?run=74