A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXV
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.88.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- d
- de
- it
- A
- In)
- The DR F F AC F.
- mony of Gresory Nazianzen acainst il,
- and adds, that Leoncius and Georoius
- Pilides confured PhiloDonus.
- But in that divided time, there vere C. 49.
- some called Theodoliani, woho made but
- one Nacure and one HyDOctalIS; and so
- fell in with the Sabellians; but others held,
- Thac there ras one immutable divine
- Essence, but cach Perion had a distinct
- individual Nacure: Which the rest charced
- with Tricheilm. Which consequence they
- utterly rejected, because althouch they held
- threc distinet Natures, vet they said, They
- vere but one Cod, because there ras but
- one invariable Divinity in them. Nice.
- phorus soith, that Conons Follovers re-
- jected Philoponus; but Photius mentions
- a conference between Conon and others, a- Phot. Bib-
- bout Philoxonus, wherein he defends bim
- acainst other Severians. Phorius erants,
- that Conon and his Follovers held a con-
- Tubstantial Trinier and che Unier ot the
- Ciochead, and 10 tar ther ivere Ortho-
- dOx: but saith, They evere tar trom il,
- erhen ther alterted proxer and peculiar
- Substancesto cach Perlon. The difference
- lioch. C0d.
- betioeen Conon and Philovonus about this Phot. Cod.
- point, (for Conon urote acainst Philopo- 28
- nus about the Resurrection) scems to have
- heen partly in the Doctrine, but chiesty in
- XXXV
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXV. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0041?run=74