A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXVII
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.93.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- The DR FF AC F.
- doth assert plainty, that the common Na-
- ture is separated from the Individuals, 2n
- lia envolce, by a mere act of the Mind;
- se that he allon d no individual 2nity in the
- divine Nature, but what vas in the several
- Persons; as the common Nature of Man is
- a Notion of the Mind, as it is abstracted
- from the several Individuals, wherein alone
- it really subsists; so that here is an apparent
- difference between the Doctrine of Jol.
- PhiloDonus and the ne Explication, for
- herein the most real, essential and indivi-
- Sible Onity oF the divine Nature is asser- Modest exa
- red; and it is said to be no Species, BC- min. P. 19.
- Cau(e IE IS DUE OnC, and so it could not be
- condemned in Poli. Philoponus.
- 2. Wenon come to Abbat Joactum, whose
- Doctrine seems to be as much mistahen, as
- it is represente d in the Dccrecal, where the
- Condemnation of it by the Lateran Coun-
- cilus extant. Dut here Lcannot hut observe
- what crear Authority these Vnitarians sive
- to this Lateran Couneil, as if they had a
- Mind to set up Transubstantiacion bV it.
- Which they so often parallel with the Trini-
- ty. Thence in their late Discourse they
- speak of it as che most seneral Couneit Discourseof
- Reat and
- that vas ever called, and chat Whac W aS Nominat
- chere detined, iE Was made Heresie 10 Op. Trinir p. 4.
- Pole II. But by their favour, ve neither
- DWvn
- XX
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXVII. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0043?run=74