Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 72

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. AVindication of
  2. be a distinet Mind in Beins from all orher
  3. Minds, betore it can refect upon ic PelF.
  4. Buc we are not vet cometo the boc
  5. tom ot chismatter. For a5 10 Individu-
  6. at Persons, chere are these things RiII +0
  7. De consiclerd.
  8. +. Lctual Existence in it PeIF, ertrich
  9. hach a Mode belonsins to it, or elic thie
  10. humane Nature ot Christ could noc have
  11. Been united wich ehe divine, buc ic must
  12. have hadthe personal subsistence, and Con-
  13. sequenly there must have been rvo Per-
  14. sons in Christ.
  15. 2. R separate and divided Existence
  16. from all others, which arises trom the
  17. actual Exiltence, but mas bedistinguis.
  18. catrom it; and (o che humane Nature oF
  19. Christ, although ic had ehie Subsiltence
  20. prorer to Beins, yet had noc a separate
  21. Existence, alter che Lypostatical Vnion.
  22. 2. The peculiar manner oF Subsistence,
  23. Wrhich lies in Puch properties as arc in-
  24. conmunicable to any other; and herein
  25. lies the proxer realon of Personality. Which
  26. dorh noc consist in a meer Intellicent Be-
  27. ing, buc in that peculiar manner oF Sub-
  28. filtence in that Being erhich can DC in
  29. no oltier. For wvtien che common Na-
  30. cure dorh subsict in Individuals, there is
  31. noc ouly a separate Existence, bur lome.
  32. chire

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 72. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0144?run=74