A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 89
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- ds
- the Doctrine of the Trinier.
- But thele, I chink are plain cnoueh t0
- ans one thac Will noc put his Fyes
- In an ochier place, S. Basit makies the
- Came Objection and gires the lame anfiver.
- One Cod the Father, and one God the Son:
- hou canthis be, and yet not ruo Cods: Be-
- cause, Caithhe, the son hath the very same
- Fssence with the Father. Not tuo Fssences
- divided out of one, as tivo Brothers; but
- as Father and Son, the Son subsistine as
- from the Father, hut in the same individu-
- at Fence: 20) ZHS SOICS ZQVZOV.
- But Curcellaeus hathone fetch Vet, VIZ. CUPN. LF3.
- That S. Batil denied 60d 1o be one in Num-
- ber, and made him tobe one in Nature, be-
- cause he loot d on a specifick Dnity or 2nity
- of Nature asmore exact than numerical. S.
- Basit loold on the dirine Nature as Puch
- to have che most perfect Onity, becaule
- otus Simplicity, and not inthelcast lpcale-
- ins oFit a5a specisick Dnity; hut Curcellae - N. 105.
- us himselF CalIS chis, an Onity by a mere
- Fiction of the Mind; and can he imagine
- this tohave been more accurate than are-
- 2l Onity: These are hard Mitis in a de
- Sperate causc.
- Atcer aII, Our Enitarians teIl uS, That T. II F. 30.
- S. Basil doth acainst Funomius allou a di-
- stinction in Number with respect to theDei-
- Y. But HOW: 45 +o the P sence: BY nO
- WCaHS.
- Dalil. T. L.
- P. 604
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 89. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0161?run=74