A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 96
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- A Pindication of
- rould not allo chree LEypostases, Was,
- because ther vould noc allere three sub-
- Stances. So that Curcellaeus his LIypothe-
- (is hath very licile colour for it amone
- the Latin lathers; Cince S. Ferom there
- Paith, it rould De Sacrileze to hold threc
- Substances, and he Freely beltons an 1-
- nathema uxon any one that alserted more
- than Onc.
- But sTilary, Caith Curcellaeus, oons a spe-
- Cur. 1. 69. cisick 2niey, tor in his Book de Smodis,
- he BCNS, That by one Substance, they did
- not mean one individual Substance, but sucts
- as vas in Adam and Seth, thatis of the same
- kind. Noman asseres thernitr and Indis-
- crimination ot the divine Substance more
- fully and frequently than he doch; and
- that without any Difference or Variation,
- 45 10 the Father and the Son. And al-
- thoush asainst che drians he may use thac
- For ar Illustration, ol adam and Seth; yee
- ertien he comes to explain himselt, he
- declares it must be understood in a way
- derecable ro the divine Nature. And he
- denies any Division of the Substance De-
- tveen Father and Son, but he asterts one
- and the lame Substance to be in Boch;
- and althouch the Person of the Son remains
- 2. n. 6. distinet from the lerson of the Pather, vet
- he sublists in that Substance of vhich he vas
- becotter,
- Hilar. de
- FLitar. de
- Frinit. B.
- Synod.
- 67
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 96. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0168?run=74