A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 97
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.78.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- t
- rec
- A.
- d6
- bit
- lid
- ACt
- M
- diso
- Li
- l
- Iab
- AIH
- Ne
- s
- the Doctrine of the Prinicy.
- Becorren, and nothine is raken off from the
- substance of the Father, by his beine becot-
- ten of it.
- But dochhe not lay, That he hatha LCe.
- sitimate and proper Substance of his oon be-
- coeten Nature from Cod, the Father. And Llilar. de
- Syrod. H
- ivhat is this, but to oon to distinet Sub. 18.
- Stances d
- FTo can the substance be distinct, il it
- De the very lame; and the son subsist in
- that substance of Which he vas becotten:
- And chat FTilary (Belides a mulcitude ot
- Paltases to che lame purpole in him) can-
- not be underHtood ot tro dictinet Sub.
- Rances willapocar by chis Fvidence.
- The Drians in their Conteltion ol Faich Hitar. ds
- betore the Conneil oF Nice Pet dorrna- Friniet. _s
- mono the leveral Herelies wrtrich etiev
- condemned; that ot FTieracas, Who laid
- ihe Father and Son ivere like tuo Lamps
- siiins out of one common Vesset of dil.
- FTilary Was sensible that under chis thae
- Exprection ivas Ccruck ar, 60d of 60d,
- Licht of Licht, Whichhe Church omned.
- ITis AnCVeriS, Luminis Naturae Onitas est,
- non ex connexione porrectio. I e. Eliey arc
- noc tro divided Liolus, trom onc com
- tron Scocle; buc che Came Liolit remain.
- ins alter it vas kindled that it was be-
- FOro. AS appears by his WOrdS, Licht
- B. 12.
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 97. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0169?run=74