A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 98
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- A Vindication of
- of Licht Caithhe implies, ThaE
- quod iine decrimento it sives to another chat which
- Tuo naturam Cuam Dra
- Aac ex lct, e quod doc
- it continues to have it selF.
- habet, e quod dederit And Petavius Cairh, that the
- hrabeat, acen4. quod Opinion oE FPieracas WaS, That
- the substance of the Father and
- Son differ d Numerically as one Lamp from
- Decar de another. And Filary calls it an Frror ot
- TriMIIS. S. dane Onderstandins wrtrich vould
- udse ot God, by irhac cher tind in Onc
- another.
- Curces. n. Doth nOt S. Ambrose CaY, a5 Curcellaeus
- 90.
- quores hrim. That thé Father and Son are
- not tuo Cods, because all menare said t0 be
- of one Substance:
- AmhOT. But S Ambrose is directiy acainst him.
- de vide For, he lait, The Arians objected, that il
- 5: 6. 3.
- ed. Nor. they made the Son true God, and Con-sub
- stantial with the Father, they must make tuo
- Cods; as there are tivo men, or tivo Sheep.
- of the same Fsence; but e Man and a Sheep
- are not said tobe Men, or rvo seep. Which
- iher said eo excuse themselves, because ther
- made the Son of a different kind and. sub
- stance fromthe Father. And Wtrat Antiver
- doth S. Ambrose sive tochis:
- L. FTe Caith, Plurality accordine to the
- Scripeures rather falls on those of different
- kinds; and cheretore wrten ther male
- eliem ot several hinds, ther must mate
- deveral 60d5.
- 2. ThaC
- Lumen ex lumine,
- 6. 6. 8. 37
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 98. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0170?run=74