A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 116
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- A Vindication os
- the FToly Chost. Andro the Came purpole.
- in otter placestre Carth; That there are di-
- Stinct FLypostases with their peculiar Pro-
- perties; Wwhich beine jorne d with thenity
- of Nature make up the true Confession of
- Faith. There vere Lome who vould have
- Dut One TEypostasis; Whom he oppoles
- vich great vehiemener; and the Realon
- He sives, 15, That then they must make the
- Persons to be meer Names; Which 1S, Sa-
- bellianisn. And, he Paith, That if our No-
- tions of distinet Persons have no certain
- Foundation theyare meer Names, such as Sa-
- vellius called Persons. Butby this Founda-
- tion he dochnocmeon any distinet Psences,
- Dut the incommunicable Properties belone
- ine to them, as Father, Son and Tloly Chost.
- Itis plain trom hence, that thC neCeNTIEY
- ot altertins three TEypostases, came From
- thence, thac ochervile ther could noc (0
- ell dictinguissi chemlelves From the Sa-
- bellians Whrole Doctrine ther urterty dil-
- omned; asell a5 arianism and Fudai sm;
- AchanaI. and it appears by the Pestimonies oF Arha-
- Cireo Na nasius Crecory Nazianzen and S. Basil, that
- 3. 16. they lookd on onc as bad as the otber:
- and ther commoniy joyn fudaism, and
- Dabelliani (m Eogerher.
- Buc vet chere arole Difficulties, Wvhe-
- ther they evere to hold onc sypostasis or
- three
- EpiIc. 64
- s
- BaTII.
- HOM. 27
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 116. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0188?run=74