A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 117
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- se
- 1
- the Doctrine of the Priniey.
- Threc. The Former insisted on tlie gene-
- rally received sense ot TTypostasis For
- Substance or Fissence; and theretore they
- could noc hold chree Eypostases without
- chree distinct Essences, 25 thc Platonists
- and Marcionists held. Opon this a Sy.
- nod vas called at lexandria to adjust
- this matcer, evhrere both P’arties Were de- RuFin. p.
- sired to explain chemselves. Thole Wvhro 2I1. histo
- held chree Arpoctales ivere askred, WWhe. Actian.
- ther they maintained three Flypostases a5 Ep. ad An-
- the Arians did, of different Substances and tioet, P.
- separate Subsistences, as Mantind and o-
- ther Creatures are: Or as other Flereticks,
- three Principles or three Gods: Allwhich
- cher Cedtastly denied. Then they vere
- astred, Why they used those terms: They
- anlivered, Because ther believed the FToly
- Trinity to be more than mere Names; and
- that the Father, and Son, and FToly Ghost
- had a real Subsistence belongins to them:
- but stilt they held but one Godhead, one
- Principle, andthe Son of the same Substance
- with the Father; and the FToly Ghost not
- tobe a Creature, bat to bear the same pro-
- per and inseparable Pssence vith the F’ather
- and the Son. Then che other Side vere
- astred, When ther asserted but one TTypo-
- stasis, Whether they held with Sabellius or
- not; and that the Son and LLoly Chost had
- 37
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 117. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0189?run=74