Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 63

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. of Deism On MIr. Lock, by Memins chac
  2. fome oF his Notions arc nor inconsilteur
  3. with chem; and that some ot the Ouesti-
  4. ons wrhich he discusses mas berais d uDon
  5. their Principles, tha none ot them done-
  6. cellarily devend upon thole Principles:
  7. and a great part ot his Ellar is directls
  8. contrary to chacnhich the Remarker lays
  9. he cannor bue chink is the Mistery aim d
  10. at all alone, but conceald trom us, viz
  11. That the Sont of Mlan is noc a distinct perma-
  12. nene substance. Let the impartial, judsc
  13. prhecher ehis De to arrue fairly; or whe- Vide 2R
  14. ther ic docs no look like a desire to make p. 12.
  15. use ef Names to no very tair purpose. But
  16. thac I may noc De luspected to haremis-
  17. reprelented the Remarkers may ot impu-
  18. tine the Deists Principles EO MT. Lock, I
  19. will a5 brieAy as postible, run over the
  20. Parciculars which he compares to them.
  21. The erand Principle of Deism (Cayshe) 3R. P. 23
  22. is this, Theres one Infinite, niversal Spirit
  23. that actuates Matter alvays, nithout the Ope-
  24. ration of parricular Spirits: And is the Soul
  25. of Man be nothine but an infux from ano-
  26. ther Principle, not a distinet permanent Sub-
  27. stance, whosoever soes upon this Principle, L
  28. de not monder if he cannot allom Innate Ideas,
  29. or Practicat Principles in the Soul; for there
  30. is no permanent Soul toimprint them upon.
  31. CAnsiv.) But may noc onc rrho doesehinte
  32. the Soul a permanent substance, doube
  33. chat ichas anz Ideas bucrhar ic reccired
  34. trom sentation and Refection; Decause he
  35. iS nOE conscious OF aAY BUE WhaL he CaN
  36. XTaCC

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 63. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0085?run=74