Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 64

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.86.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. aY
  2. C
  3. 64
  4. erace co those Originals And the Porer
  5. or Faculties ot receirine Idcas, no lets re
  6. quire a permanent Substanceto Exist in,
  7. than Idcas themselres. Moreover ((27e
  8. he Remarker) upon that Lsypothesis the sont
  9. cannot be said eo be immortal. And Wrhat is
  10. tnat; IpCaY, tO MT. LockE IIaS he auy
  11. votere coldus that the soul cannot be Taid
  12. +o BeImmortar Doeshe not Freguenti
  13. proters a AedFast beliet that thesoul is
  14. d mmortal: IIas he not zcalousy con-
  15. tested that our ignorance ot ihat kind ot
  16. SuBitance the sont is, doco not at aI
  17. eallen the alturances of itsmmortality
  18. Why Then is this, Thot the Soul cannot be
  19. said to be immorial, brought in 2s an opinion
  20. Ot MT. LockS, but at any rate to make
  21. that Posicion, That the sont is not a distinct
  22. substance, De supposd a Principle ot
  23. MIS d
  24. Furthermore (Pays the RerrarKeE) in
  25. conseguence of this Principle of Deilm, and
  26. the Morraliry of the soul, creat difficulties
  27. must needs arise tothem about the Resuirrecti.
  28. on, TTor it can be the same Man, or the
  29. same Perlon, that rises arain, when boththe
  30. Body and the soul are nev and this non d
  31. brins on nice disputes abont the Notions of
  32. Identity, and Diversuy, wbich accordinoly
  33. ve sind discusse d at laree inthe Essay, for their
  34. sarisfaction, suppose, that eo upon those Princi-
  35. ples. IE may De 10, But the Remarker
  36. must sire me leare to suppose 100; that
  37. thole Notions are not discuss d for cheir
  38. Eatisfaction alone, irto so upon cholePrin.
  39. Ciples
  40. Pe)
  41. LV OccCH
  42. et 5 24
  43. Lbteto

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 64. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0086?run=74