Search the Nachlass

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 163

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Ctap. XX
  2. III.
  3. joat iat consusea ide
  4. Idea ontr in MenS Minds, Men frequeney apply ehem to different Com
  5. parisons of Thines, accordins eo their omn Imaginations, Which do not
  6. alvays correspond with those of others, ulins the lame Names.
  7. 5. 20. Thiraly, Phat in thele T CalI Moral Relations, Phare a true NO:
  8. tion of Relarion, by comparino the Action with the Rule, Whether the
  9. Rule betrue, or False. For it Imeature any thins by a Tard, I HnOW
  10. rhether the chins Imeature be longer, or Morter, than that suppoled
  11. Tard, though, perhaps, the Lard I mealure by, be not exactls the Stan-
  12. dard: Which, indecd, is another tinquirr. For thoughthe Rule Be erro-
  13. neous, and Imistakre in it: yet che agreement, or disagreement ot that
  14. Which I compare wich it, is erideney bnomn by me; wherein consits
  15. my knomledse oE Relarion. Thoush mealurins by a Wrong Rule, P MaII
  16. thereby be brouxht to judge amils ot its moral Rectitude; Decause I have
  17. tricd it by thac ertrich is nor the true Rule: but am not mistatien in the
  18. relation char action bears to chat Rule I compare it to, Which is aeree.
  19. ment, or dilaercement.
  20. CHAP. AANIII.
  21. Of Cum aita Oosere, Distinet and Consused Ideas.
  22. Aving Mewed the Original ot our Ideas, and considered the
  23. leveral loris olchem, as Simple and Complex; and Bewed
  24. the difference in Complex ones, betrixt those ofModes, Relations, and
  25. Substances, all Which, Ithink, is necessary to be donc by any onc, Who
  26. rould acquaint himselsthroughily with the progrels ot the Mind, in its
  27. Apprehension and unoledsse ot Thines, it will, perhaps, be thouxht I
  28. have drelt lone enoush upon the Fxaminarion of Ldeas. I mult, never-
  29. chelels, crare leare ro otter lome sew other Considerations concernine
  30. them. Ttic firstis, Thatlome areclear, and ottiers obseure; fome distinct,
  31. andorhers confused.
  32. 8. 2. Perception ol the Mind, beine most apely explained by Nords re
  33. latins ro the Sight, We all belt underltand irhat is meant by Clear, and
  34. Obscure in our ideas, by restectins on what e call Clear and Obscure
  35. in ehe Objects oF Sight. Light beins char which discovers to us visible
  36. Objects, ve sire the name oiObscure, ro chat, which is not placed in a
  37. Light, sufficient to discorer minutely to us theFisure and Colours, whick
  38. are obserrable in it, and wtrich, in a berter Lizhr, would he discernable.
  39. Thusour simple Ideas are clear, When they are such as the Objects chem.
  40. selves, trom irhence they rere tatien, did, in a Well. ordered Senlation
  41. Or Perception, prelent them. Whilst the Memory retains ehem thus, and
  42. can produce themso, tothemind, When ever it has occation to consider
  43. ehem, ther are clear Ideas. So Par as they cither vant ans thins oF that
  44. original Fxactnels, or tave lost any of their Airst Fretnels, and are, a5 it
  45. vere, taded or tarnistred by Time, (o Far arether obscure. Complex Ideas,
  46. as tliey are made up of Simple: ones lo ther are clear wrhen the Ideas,
  47. thac eo co their Compolition, arc clear; and the Number and Order ot
  48. chole simple Ideas, chat are che lngredients ol any Complex one, is deter-
  49. minate and certaim.
  50. f. 3. The cause of Obscurity in simple Ideas, secus ove clister au
  51. Orxans; or very Rislit and cranliens imprections made by ihe Objects:

Cite

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 163. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0179?run=74